The curfewed night by basharat peer book review and summary - ReadersHub

The curfewed night by Basharat peer 






The cur

The book is grounded on impulses and presents a one- sided narrative. It's listed towards justifying the zealots and presenting the problem of Kashmiri secessionists as the problem of common Kashmiri people. From the beginning itself, the book presents and advocates the separatist docket. The author keeps on justifying that the presence of service is rough for Kashmiris but he fails to explain the crimes committed by the zealots trained and armed in Pakistan to wage war against India and dismembering peace in Kashmir. 
 
 Although the author tried his stylish to portray the harmony between both the Kashmiri Hindus and Muslims before 1990, but fails in hiding his real passions. Then are a many extracts from the book, 
“ The religious peak was visible only on the days India and Pakistan played justice. Muslims supported the Pakistani justice platoon; the Pandits were for India. Yet the pressures, which were incompletely class- grounded, noway coddled into insular violence. But effects fell piecemeal after the eruption of fortified conflict. ” 
 
" We didn't relate to the symbols of Indian nationalism — the flag, the public hymn, the justice platoon. We followed every justice match India and Pakistan played but we noway cheered for the Indianteam.However, we supported Pakistan; if India played the West Indies, we supported the West Indies; if India played England, If India played Pakistan." 
There's also citation of hijacking of Rubaiya seeds, son of also home minister, by JKLF. JKLF demanded the release of their jugged musketeers for releasing her. The book also accepts the involvement of Pakistan in spreading bellicosity in the region. Then's an extract 
 
 “ That downtime, too, busloads of Kashmiri youth went to border municipalities and crossed over to Pakistan and Pakistan- administered Kashmir for arms training. They returned as zealots carrying Kalashnikovs, hand grenades, light machine ordnance, and rocket launchers issued by Pakistan. ” 
The author has written that Yasin Malik led the zealots of JKLF but at the same time is unhappy when he's arrested. He finds it ruthless when the India Government responded. It's an irony that according to the author, training of Kashmiri youths as terrorist is fine but when the service fights back, it's a torture and ruthlessstep.Most importantly, he failed to mention why the need arised to emplace army in Kashmir. The book substantially focuses on portraying how the army spoilt their lives but he failed to realise that it's the bellicosity that gave rise to this situation. 
 
 The author only glamourises and idolises zealots and terrorism and the book is solely meant to present the problem of Kashmir as problem of Kashmiri Muslims who supported the zealots and secessionists ideas. 
The book also fails to showcase the plight of the Kashmiri Pandits who had to leave the vale overnight. He has veritably smoothly touched the outpour and mass killings of Kashmiri Pandits. 
 
 The history style is veritably plain and flat. It presents stories and particles of gests that the author gathered from colorful people. It jumps from one incident to another. This hinders the inflow of history which isn't smooth and presents the story in bits and pieces. 
Although the book gives a good sapience of the life of Kashmir, it presents a one- sided view, the standpoint of people who supported secessionists. The book shows a lot of hate towards India. The book is misleading the vulnerable youth of Kashmir and spreads false propaganda. Though the last many chapters are mellowed down but I would have loved if he'd have explained the problems faced by common peace loving Kashmiri people due to militant insurrection, irrespective of their religion. 
 
 
 This book is predicated on impulses and presents a one- sided narrative. It's listed towards justifying the crusaders and presenting the problem of Kashmiri separatists as the problem of common Kashmiri people. From the beginning itself, the book presents and advocates the separatist program. The author keeps on justifying that the presence of service is rough for Kashmiris but he fails to explain the crimes committed by the crusaders trained and armed in Pakistan to wage war against India and dismembering peace in Kashmir. 
Although the author tried his swish to portray the harmony between both the Kashmiri Hindus and Muslims before 1990, but fails in hiding his real heartstrings. also are a numerous excerpts from the book, 
 “ The religious peak was visible only on the days India and Pakistan played justice. Muslims supported the Pakistani justice team; the Pandits were for India. Yet the pressures, which were partly class- predicated, noway coddled into sectarian violence. But goods fell piecemeal after the eruption of fortified conflict. ” 
 
" We did not relate to the symbols of Indian nationalism — the flag, the public hymn, the justice team. We followed every justice match India and Pakistan played but we noway cheered for theIndianteam.However, we supported Pakistan; if India played the West Indies, we supported the West Indies; if India played England, If India played Pakistan." 
There is also citation of kidnapping of Rubaiya seeds, son of also home minister, by JKLF. JKLF demanded the release of their jugged buddies for releasing her. The book also accepts the involvement of Pakistan in spreading militancy in the region. also's an excerpt 
 
 “ That time-out, too, busloads of Kashmiri youth went to border cosmopolises and crossed over to Pakistan and Pakistan- administered Kashmir for arms training. They returned as crusaders carrying Kalashnikovs, hand grenades, light machine artillery, and rocket launchers issued by Pakistan. ” 
 The author has written that Yasin Malik led the crusaders of JKLF but at the same time is unhappy when he is arrested. He finds it ruthless when the India Government responded. It's an irony that according to the author, training of Kashmiri youths as terrorist is fine but when the service fights back, it's a torture andruthlessstep.Most importantly, he failed to mention why the need arised to emplace army in Kashmir. The book mainly focuses on portraying how the army spoilt their lives but he failed to realise that it's the militancy that gave rise to this situation. 

 The author only glamourises and idolises crusaders and terrorism and the book is solely meant to present the problem of Kashmir as problem of Kashmiri Muslims who supported the crusaders and separatists ideas. 
 The book also fails to showcase the plight of the Kashmiri Pandits who had to leave the dale overnight. He has truly easily touched the exodus and mass killings of Kashmiri Pandits. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

100 books everyone should read - ReadersHub

The fault in our stars quotes - ReadersHub

The legends of pensam book summary - Readershub

The girl on the train book quotes by paula Hawkins - Readershub

Man's search for meaning book review - ReadersHub

Every breath Nicholas Sparks book review - ReaderHub

Book Review : all the light we cannot see by anthony doerr - Readershub

November 9 book quotes by colleen hoover - Readershub

Top 31 best books to Read for teenagers - ReadersHub

Book Review : The fault in our stars by john green - ReadersHub